COIN VALUE GUIDES

Dime Errors by Year: Pictures, Identification and Values

Identify Mercury and Roosevelt dime errors by year, with real coin photos, normal-versus-error comparisons, No P and No S distinctions and dated price evidence.

Attributed 1982 No P Roosevelt dime obverse
In this article

Which dime errors are worth checking?

Dime errors include wrong-planchet and off-center strikes; overdates and specific missing-mint-mark issues need their own diagnostics. An unmarked 1966 dime is normal, while 1982 No P and certain No S Proof dimes are collectible issues. Identify year, strike type and condition first; selected historical sales below are comparisons, not current quotes.

Value evidence reviewed November 12, 2026. Historical sales retain their original dates and are not current offers.

Which real coin details should I compare?

1942/1 Philadelphia Mercury dime, obverse: arrow identifies the overdate area below Liberty.
1942/1 Philadelphia Mercury dime, obverse: arrow identifies the overdate area below Liberty.
Same 1942/1 reference, reverse: fasces and olive branch; check the mint-mark position beside the base.
Same 1942/1 reference, reverse: fasces and olive branch; check the mint-mark position beside the base.

How do the normal features, errors and values differ?

Why does the year change the missing-mint-mark test?

The Mercury dime’s Winged Liberty portrait and the Roosevelt dime’s presidential portrait belong to different series. The change in design and the later transition from silver to clad coinage matter before any error test. A normal Philadelphia Mercury dime has no mint mark, and mint marks were intentionally omitted during 1965–1967. A blank area on those coins is not comparable with a later die that should carry a mark.

Sinnock’s Roosevelt dime began in 1946. For ordinary issues dated 1965 onward, clad construction is the normal baseline. The collector Special Mint Set (SMS) issues of 1965–1967 also need their own classification. For broader normal-value context, use the Mercury dime guide or Roosevelt dime guide.

Selected dime errors and varieties by year
Year / issueWhat to checkNormal comparisonIssue distinctionNext action
1942/1 MercuryUnderlying date contoursNormal 1942 datePhiladelphia and Denver varieties differMatch the correct overdate
1966 SMS5-shaped cheek feature, FS-401Normal SMS portraitCollector strike, not missing mint mark1966 dime error guide
1968, 1970, 1975, 1983 No SMissing expected S on the Proof issueOrdinary circulation coins can lack SMust establish Proof statusUse year-specific Proof diagnostics
1982 No P RooseveltMissing expected P; match attributed issueNormal 1982-P circulation dimeStrong and Weak varieties are distinguishedConfirm attribution and surfaces
1965–1967 RooseveltNo mint markIntentional omissionNormal circulation or SMSNo missing-mark premium by absence alone
Any relevant yearOff-center strike or wrong planchetNormal flan, design placement and metalIndividual production faultInspect both faces, edge and measurements

How do I tell a real overdate from damage?

On a 1942/1 Mercury dime, remnants of the underlying date are part of a specific doubled-die variety. Check the whole date, not a single line that happens to resemble a 1. Philadelphia and Denver have separate varieties; the Philadelphia photograph above is not a diagnostic template for every 1942-D dime. An added piece of metal or a damaged digit can imitate an overdate.

A useful photograph has enough context to locate the mark, followed by a sharp detail view. If the date is too worn or altered to match reliable diagnostics, keep the attribution unresolved. Do not clean the date to make a suspected feature “show up.” The same rule applies to the recognized 1966 SMS cheek variety.

Does no P on a 1982 dime mean the same as no mark in 1966?

Attributed 1982 No P Roosevelt dime: inspect the expected mint-mark area above the date.
Attributed 1982 No P Roosevelt dime: inspect the expected mint-mark area above the date.

No. In 1982, the missing expected Philadelphia P is the feature of a recognized issue. By contrast, no mint mark was expected on an ordinary 1966 dime. Start with the date, then compare the correct mark location and attribution. Dirt, wear or an altered surface can obscure a letter, so absence in a photograph is only the beginning of examination.

NGC distinguishes Strong and Weak forms of the 1982 No P issue. Those descriptions concern the recognized varieties, not a license to call any poorly struck or worn dime a missing-P coin.

What is different about a No S Proof dime?

No S Proof dimes are particular collector issues missing a mark expected for their issue. A normal circulation dime from the same year is not converted into a No S Proof by lacking S. Establish the strike category, surfaces and exact date first. A mirrored or polished surface by itself does not prove Proof manufacture.

This distinction prevents one of the most expensive comparison mistakes: applying a rare Proof transaction to an ordinary unmarked circulation dime. A potentially valuable No S Proof needs expert authentication. Keep packaging or provenance when available, but check the coin itself rather than relying on a seller’s label.

Where is the 1966 SMS cheek diagnostic?

Same 1966 SMS FS-401 cheek close-up used in the dedicated year guide; arrow locates the 5-shaped detail.
Same 1966 SMS FS-401 cheek close-up used in the dedicated year guide; arrow locates the 5-shaped detail.

The cheek feature belongs to FS-401 on the 1966 SMS issue. Compare its exact outline and position; a stain or scratch elsewhere on Roosevelt’s face is a different observation. The dedicated article provides both sides and a normal SMS comparison.

A named die variety and a random strike error should not share an assumed price. Establish the category before deciding which sale history is relevant.

What do documented dime error sales actually tell me?

Price evidence below was reviewed on November 12, 2026. These examples intentionally span different years, grades and categories. They show why one “dime error price” is misleading. The normal ten-cent face-value baseline applies to a worn modern clad dime without a premium attribution; older silver issues need their metal content and collector factors considered separately.

Selected dime transaction comparisons — USD
Coin / varietyConditionHistorical realized priceDate / sourceComparison limit
1966 SMS 5 on Cheek, FS-401PCGS SP67$366Heritage, May 12, 2026; lot 23407Specific SMS variety and grade
1966 rolled thick planchetPCGS AU58; 3 gram label$30Heritage, Jan. 7, 2014; cert 19374246Individual planchet error; not pictured
1968 No S ProofPCGS PR67$40,250Heritage, July 1, 2008; PCGS CoinFactsNot an ordinary unmarked circulation dime
Normal worn modern clad dimeNo attributed error$0.10 face valueDenomination baselineNot a valuation for silver, Proofs or varieties

How can I distinguish an error from post-mint damage?

Normal, error and damage screening
ObservationNormal or damage possibilityError candidateEvidence to collectNext step
Copper visible at edgeNormal clad copper coreMissing layer only with further evidenceBoth faces, edge and weightDo not infer error from edge color
Broad, flat coinFlattening after manufactureBroadstrike if full design survives collar failureComplete design, rim and surfacesCompare both sides
Part of design missingWear, cutting or damageOff-center strikeUnstruck flan and displaced designReject a cropped-photo conclusion
Thin or light coinWear, corrosion or filingWrong planchet / missing layerWeight, diameter, thickness and alloySeek physical examination
Extra line or facial markScratch, stain or machine doublingAttributed die varietyShape, relief and exact positionMatch diagnostics before pricing

A reference photograph helps locate a feature; it cannot verify alloy, certify a numerical grade or exclude every alteration. Use the coin grading scale to describe preservation and the appraisal guide to prepare evidence for a credible candidate.

How can I check my coin in three steps?

  1. 01Identify Mercury or Roosevelt, read the date and establish normal metal and mint-mark expectations. Separate circulation, SMS and Proof manufacture before testing a missing mark.
  2. 02Photograph both sides and the edge, then the suspected diagnostic. Match the exact year and variety. For planchet concerns, record weight and diameter; for a No S claim, establish Proof status rather than surface shine alone.
  3. 03Check for filing, removed letters, displaced metal, scratches and polishing. Preserve the surfaces and seek attribution when evidence is incomplete. Compare dated sales only after matching issue, variety, grade and condition.

What should I remember before pricing?

Year and strike category control the identification test. No mark can be normal, a recognized missing-mark issue or an alteration; the blank space alone does not decide which.

Use the 1966 dime guide for paired SMS photos and the FS-401 detail, then compare nickel errors by year or the Top 10 errors and varieties for other authenticated examples. Keep any candidate uncleaned until its evidence has been assessed.

What else do collectors ask?

Are all dimes without a mint mark valuable errors?

No. Many normal issues have no mint mark, including ordinary 1965–1967 dimes. The 1982 No P issue and specific No S Proofs require the correct year, manufacture and diagnostics.

Which years have No S Proof dime issues?

Recognized No S Proof Roosevelt dime issues include 1968, 1970, 1975 and 1983. An ordinary circulation dime from one of those years is not a No S Proof simply because it lacks S.

Is a 1966 dime the same error as a 1982 No P dime?

No. A missing mint mark is expected on an ordinary 1966 dime. The 1982 No P is a specific attributed issue missing the expected Philadelphia mark.

Does a copper-colored dime edge prove an error?

No. The copper core can be visible at the edge of a normal clad dime. A suspected missing layer or wrong planchet needs physical evidence beyond color.

Is the 1942/1 Mercury dime a double strike?

No. It is an overdate associated with a doubled die. Philadelphia and Denver have separate varieties, and damage or added metal can imitate date details.

Can a photograph establish my dime error value?

It can help screen a feature, but cannot by itself verify alloy, authenticity or a numerical grade. Use the same attribution, condition and sale terms when comparing documented transactions.

Which references support these checks?

References and further readingExpand