COIN VALUE GUIDES

1967 Nickel Errors: Identification, SMS and Value Checks

Identify real 1967 nickel errors with paired specimen photos, normal-versus-error checks, SMS distinctions and a documented wrong-planchet auction sale.

1967 Special Mint Set Jefferson nickel obverse
In this article

What makes a 1967 nickel an error, and what is it worth?

An ordinary worn 1967 nickel starts at five cents; no mint mark is normal. Special Mint Set (SMS) coins are collector strikes, not errors. An authenticated nickel struck on a dime planchet sold for $305.50 in 2016. Identify the production fault and condition before comparing that sale.

Value evidence reviewed November 12, 2026. Historical sales retain their original dates and are not current offers.

Which real coin details should I compare?

1967 SMS nickel obverse: the date is beside Jefferson; no mint mark is expected.
1967 SMS nickel obverse: the date is beside Jefferson; no mint mark is expected.
Same 1967 SMS specimen, reverse: Monticello and FIVE CENTS establish the five-cent design.
Same 1967 SMS specimen, reverse: Monticello and FIVE CENTS establish the five-cent design.

How do the normal features, errors and values differ?

Why does a 1967 nickel have no mint mark?

During the 1965–1967 mint-mark suspension, the absence of a letter was intentional. It does not identify a rare missing-mark error, nor does it tell you which facility struck your individual coin. Felix Schlag’s Jefferson and Monticello design supplies the normal comparison; the relevant question is what changed during manufacture, rather than whether a letter is absent.

Collector Special Mint Sets supplied a separate kind of strike during this period. The paired photographs show an attributed SMS specimen, not a typical worn circulation coin. Use them to locate the design and inscriptions. Do not infer SMS status from brightness alone: polishing a circulation coin can create shine while damaging its collectible surface.

Normal 1967 nickel versus suspected errors
ObservationNormal comparisonPossible explanationWhat to checkDecision
No mint markExpected in 1967Normal productionDate and denominationNot an error
Bright, reflective fieldsPossible on SMS or altered coinsCollector strike or polishingSurface texture and attributionBrightness alone is insufficient
Small flan, design cut offStandard nickel: 21.20 mm, 5.00 gPossible wrong planchetWeight, diameter, edge and alloySeek attribution
Off-center designNormal strike is centeredOff-center strike or damageDesign lost on both sides; unstruck areaCheck both faces
Raised line or lumpNormal design has no added featureDie defect, strike issue or alterationRelief, surrounding metal and repeatable diagnosticsDo not assign value from shape alone

What does a genuine wrong-planchet example look like?

PCGS certificate 31080474 identifies the specimen below as a 1967 nickel struck on a clad dime planchet, graded MS61. The nickel design does not fit on the smaller blank, so parts of the portrait-side lettering and reverse design are missing. The date is not independently readable in these photographs; the year is taken from the certificate attribution. A cropped date on an unknown coin does not prove it is this issue.

Attributed 1967 nickel on a dime planchet, obverse: the arrow points to lettering cut off at the smaller flan.
Attributed 1967 nickel on a dime planchet, obverse: the arrow points to lettering cut off at the smaller flan.
Same wrong-planchet nickel, reverse: the five-cent design extends beyond the available blank.
Same wrong-planchet nickel, reverse: the five-cent design extends beyond the available blank.

Compare that missing design with an ordinary small rim nick. A wrong-planchet candidate needs measurements and examination of the metal, not just a visual resemblance. The photographed error is a reference specimen, not evidence that any undersized or ground-down coin has the same origin. For other nickel dates, use the nickel error guide by year.

How much can a 1967 nickel error sell for?

The price evidence below was reviewed on November 12, 2026. The sale is a dated comparison for one certified error, not an offer for an ungraded coin or a current price range. Original surfaces, eye appeal, the visibility of the error and the reliability of the attribution all affect what buyers compare. A small die chip is not interchangeable with a wrong-planchet strike.

1967 nickel value evidence — USD; reviewed November 12, 2026
Issue / errorConditionValue evidenceDate / sourceHow to use it
Normal worn nickelCirculated; no attributed error$0.05 face valueDenomination baselineCollector premiums require separate evidence
1967 SMS nickelCollector strike; grade-dependentNo single price established herePCGS lists SMS separatelyCompare the same grade and finish
Struck on clad dime planchetPCGS MS61$305.50 historical realized priceHeritage, Jan. 11, 2016, lot 9631; PCGS cert 31080474One authenticated specimen; not a current quote
Suspected off-center / die defectUnattributed or damagedNot established from photographsIndividual authentication neededDo not borrow the wrong-planchet price

Do sharp Monticello steps prove an error?

Monticello step area on the 1967 SMS reference: strike detail is not itself an error.
Monticello step area on the 1967 SMS reference: strike detail is not itself an error.

No. Step detail is a strike-quality question. Wear, die condition and the strike can all affect how the horizontal lines appear. The SMS reference illustrates where to look, but does not establish a Full Steps designation for a different coin or turn weak steps into an error.

Keep production category, grade and error attribution as separate decisions. The coin grading scale guide explains preservation; a sharp reverse does not authenticate an unusual planchet.

How can I check my coin in three steps?

  1. 01Confirm Jefferson, Monticello and the 1967 date. Photograph both faces and the edge without cleaning. If the date is cut off, do not supply a year by guesswork; record the missing information.
  2. 02Measure weight on a calibrated scale and diameter without squeezing or scratching the coin. Compare with the standard 5.00 g and 21.20 mm. A mismatch is a screening clue; wear, damage and measurement error must be considered.
  3. 03Compare the suspected feature with the same error category. Look for filed edges, displaced metal, polishing and damage. Keep plausible wrong-planchet or major striking candidates uncleaned and seek an error-specialist attribution before choosing a price.

What should I remember before pricing?

A missing mint mark and an attractive SMS finish are normal categories for 1967, not proof of an error. A credible error needs a manufacturing explanation supported by both sides, the edge and measurements.

The $305.50 MS61 sale is useful only as a dated wrong-planchet example. Save clear photographs and measurements, then use a coin appraisal when the evidence warrants professional examination. For a related mint-mark comparison, see 1966 dime errors and SMS checks.

What else do collectors ask?

Is a 1967 nickel with no mint mark rare?

The missing mint mark is normal for 1967. It does not establish a rare variety or an error; grade, finish and any separately authenticated manufacturing fault must be considered.

What is the normal weight of a 1967 nickel?

The standard specification is 5.00 grams and 21.20 millimeters in diameter. Wear, damage and scale accuracy matter; a weight difference alone does not authenticate a wrong-planchet strike.

Is every shiny 1967 nickel an SMS coin?

No. Special Mint Set coins are a separate collector issue. Polishing can make an ordinary coin shiny and damage its surfaces, so brightness alone does not establish SMS status.

What is a documented 1967 nickel error price?

PCGS records a 1967 nickel struck on a clad dime planchet, MS61, selling for $305.50 at Heritage on January 11, 2016, lot 9631. This is one historical transaction, not a current price for all examples.

Does doubling on a 1967 nickel mean a doubled die?

Not automatically. A recognized doubled die requires matching die diagnostics; machine doubling, wear and damage can create misleading extra edges. Obtain a reliable attribution before assigning a variety premium.

Should I clean a possible 1967 nickel error?

No. Cleaning, polishing or scraping can remove evidence and reduce value. Preserve the coin, photograph both sides and the edge, and seek examination if the measurements and strike features support an error.

Which references support these checks?

References and further readingExpand